Factors Affecting The Rate Of Photosynthesis Biology Essay

Factors Affecting The Rate Of Photosynthesis Biology Essay The purpose of this experiment is to observe the factors affecting the Photosynthetic rate of leaves, which is measured in two ways. Firstly changing the light intensity, this will determine the rate of increase or decrease in photosynthesis. Secondly changing the availability of nutrients (Concentration of CO2) to the plants, this will directly affect the photosynthetic rate. To test the light intensity, an elodea submerged in a beaker was placed at different measurement away from the plant, to see if oxygen (bubbles) is produced. To test the availability of nutrients, different molarities of Sodium Bicarbonate was diluted in 500 ml of water with Elodea, to see if rate of photosynthesis increased or decreased. The result shows, as light intensity increases, the rate of reaction will increase at a proportional rate until a certain level is reached. At a light intensity of 400 the average increase in rate of reaction was 746v. At 4 the average increase in rate of reaction was 8676v, a difference of 7930v, which shows the rate of reaction is greatly influenced by light intensity. As the molarity of Sodium Bicarbonate increases, the rate of reaction will also increase at a proportional rate with respect to light intensity. At 0.05M the average increase in rate of reaction was 0.80r. At 0.1M the average increase in rate of reaction was 1.90r, a difference of 1.1r, which shows the rate of reaction is also significantly influenced by the availability of nutrients. Both light intensity and availability of nutrients are important factors that affect the rate of photosynthesis. Aim To investigate how different factors affect the rate of photosynthesis. The variables that will be changed are different intensity of light and different molarities of Sodium bicarbonate and then measuring the rate of reaction (photosynthetic rate). Hypothesis Throughout this experiment the light intensity and different molarities of Sodium Bicarbonate will be varied. The variable that is measured will be time, for rate of reaction. As light intensity increases the rate of reaction will increase at a proportional rate. As the concentration of NaHCO3 increases the rate of the reaction will also increase at a proportional rate. Introduction Every species on earth needs some kind of energy source in order to survive. In animal cells, the mitochondria produce ATP from cellular respiration. However, the plant cells have a different type of center that produces energy-chloroplasts. Plants go through the process of photosynthesis. The main process of photosynthesis is the absorption of light by chlorophyll, found in leaves and the immersion of carbon dioxide from the environment, and together they produce oxygen and sugar (energy). The equation below represents the photosynthesis reaction: The purpose of this experiment is to test whether factors such as light intensity and level of Carbon dioxide, will affect the rate of photosynthesis, which are the two most important variables in the photosynthesis process. This was demonstrated by Robert Hill in 1938, known as The Hill Reaction. Robert Hill and his associates at the University of Illinois found that the photosynthetic rate varies with light intensity, and as the light intensity increases, the reaction rate also increases up to a certain point. Apparatus needed for the Experiment Elodea 20mm ² syringe Capillary tubing Stand Stopwatch Ruler NaHCO ³ Solution Bench lamp Distilled water Figure A) Potometer Method The apparatus is set (see Fig. A) with the syringe full of the 0.01M solution of NaHCO3 solution. Two marks 10cm apart are made on the capillary tubing. The syringe is placed 0.05m away from the lamp. Using the syringe plunger the meniscus of the NaHCO3 is set so that it is level with the first mark. A stopwatch is then started. The meniscus should gradually move down the capillary tube as the elodea produces oxygen as a by-product of photosynthesis. As the oxygen is produced it increases the pressure in the syringe and so the meniscus is pushed down the tube. Light Intensity = 1 / Distance ² (m) When the meniscus reaches the level of the bottom mark the stopwatch should be stopped. Light intensities have been worked out using the following equation: 6. Using the same piece of elodea and the same distance between the lamp and the syringe the experiment (steps 1 to 5) should be repeated for the other concentration of NaHCO3. 7. The experiment (steps 1 to 6) should then be repeated at each different distance between the syringe and the light for all the NaHCO3 concentrations. The remaining distances are 0.05m, 0.06m, 0.07m, 0.08m, 0.1m, 0.2m, 0.3m, and 0.5m. 8. The entire experiment should then be repeated three times in order to obtain more accurate data and to get rid of any anomalies that may occur in a single experiment. In order to make this experiment as accurate as possible a number of steps must be taken. The same piece of elodea should be used each time in order to make sure that each experiment is being carried out with the same leaf surface area. The amount of NaHCO3 solution should be the same for each experiment. 20mm ² should be used each time. The distance should be measured from the front of the lamp to the syringe. Although taking these steps will make the experiment more accurate, its accuracy is still limited by several factors. From these recorded times I will work out the rate of the reaction using the following equation. Rate of the Reaction = 1 / Time (s) Results Table1. (Average of the 4 trails of Molarity against Light intensity): Molarity of NaHCO3 Light Intensity 1/d ² (m) 0.00 (Distilled water) 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.07 400 3571 1666 1099 523 200 278 1670 5183 988 600 375 204 4998 4485 1175 1005 473 156 5590 2300 1770 1445 621 100 9990 3150 2900 2552 1224 25 4762 3984 2850 1640 11 5945 4348 3780 2830 4 16480 11904 5196 6578 Using these results I worked out the rate Rate Of the Reaction = 1 / Time(s) x 1000 The rate was multiplied by 1000 to make the numbers easier to handle. Table2.Average of the 4 trails in rate of reaction: Molarity of NaHCO3 Light Intensity 1/d ² (m) 0.00 (Distilled water) 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.07 400 0.28 0.60 0.91 1.91 5.00 278 0.60 0.19 1.01 1.67 2.67 204 0.20 0.22 0.85 1.00 2.11 156 0.18 0.43 0.56 0.69 1.61 100 0.10 0.32 0.34 0.39 0.82 25 0.21 0.25 0.35 0.61 11 0.17 0.23 0.26 0.35 4 0.06 0.08 0.19 0.15 Light intensity against NaHCO3 Graph1. Analysis Discussion of Results Analysis: Distilled water: With the distilled water the rate of reaction went up from 0.1 to 0.4 when the light intensity was increased from 100 to 400. This is a 4 times rise which is quite large. The curve on the graph does however level out quite soon showing that the rate is being limited by the lack of NaHCO3 in the water. 0.01M NaHCO3: At a light intensity of 4 the rate is 0.06 but this rises to 0.6 when the light intensity is brought up to 400. The curve is very shallow and levels off towards a light intensity of 350 400. 0.02M NaHCO3: The amount of NaHCO3 is double that of the 0.01M NaHCO3 experiment. The rate also finishes off twice that of the 0.01M experiment. This would suggest that there was a directly proportional relationship between the amount of NaHCO3 and the rate of reaction. 0.05M NaHCO3: The curve for the 0.05M NaHCO3 is steeper than the previous curves. The rate rises to 1.9 at a light intensity of 400. 0.07M NaHCO3: The 0.07M NaHCO3 test produces a line which is steeper than all the previous curves. The plant is using the extra CO2 to photosynthesize more. As the plant has more CO2 the limiting factor caused by the lack of CO2 is reduced. This test did produce a big anomaly. The rate for a light intensity of 400 is 5. By following the line of best fit I can see that this result should be more like 3.5. The elodea for this test was very close to the light source. It is possible that it had been left here for a while which caused the lamp to heat the elodea up. This would have increased the rate of reaction of the plants enzymes which would have increased the photosynthesis rate. 0.1M NaHCO3: The 0.1M NaHCO3 produced the steepest line. Near the end of the line it looks as if the rate of reaction is hit by another limiting factor. The line goes up steadily but then between a light intensity of 300 and 400 levels off very quickly. This would suggest that at a 0.1M NaHCO3 is sufficient for the plant to photosynthesize at its maximum rate with its current environmental conditions. Increasing the NaHCO3 concentration after this level would therefore have no effect unless the next limiting factor was removed. Discussion: The hypothesis was that the rate of photosynthesis would increase if the light intensity and NaHCO3 levels were increased (please refer to Graph1). As the elodea absorbed the light and CO2 it produced oxygen gas which increased the pressure in the syringe. This pushed the air bubble in the capillary tube down. The chloroplasts produce ATP and reduce NADP to NADPH2 when exposed to light. It is at this stage of the reaction that oxygen is produced as a waste product, furthermore, the data collected was supported by the results obtained by Robert Hill and his associates at the University of Illinois, where they predicted, as the light intensity and NaHCO3 levels increased, the rate of photosynthesis will also increase up to a certain level (please refer to Graph2) As predicted when the light intensity increases so does the rate of photosynthesis. It was predicted that a level would be reached where increasing the light intensity would have no more effect on the rate of reaction as there would be some other limiting factor which limits the rate of the reaction. The rate increases at a steady rate as the light intensity increases until near the end of each line where the rate decreases. This is either because the photosynthesis reaction has reached its maximum rate of reaction or another factor is limiting the rate. As 6 different CO2 concentrations were used I can see that the first five reactions are not occurring at their maximum rate as there is the 0.1M NaHCO3 rest which is occurring at a faster rate then the other 5. The photosynthesis reactions of the other five tests must therefore be limited by the concentration of CO2 to the plant. As predicted when the NaHCO3 concentration is increased the plant in able to get more CO2 which causes the rate of reaction to go up. It was predicted that once the NaHCO3 had been raised above a certain level increasing the rate further would have no effect as there would be other limiting factors limiting the rate of the reaction. As the NaHCO3 concentration the water was increased the rate of photosynthesis also increased. The plant therefore made more oxygen as a waste product. At a NaHCO3 concentration of 0.1M once the light intensity gets above 300 the rate of reaction decreases significantly. This could be because photosynthesis is occurring at its maximum possible rate or because another limiting factor is restraining the rate of reaction. The fact that the curve levels off so quickly indicates that there is another limiting factor restraining photosynthesis. It could be temperature. These tests are being carried out at room temperature so the temperature would have to be raised another 15 °C before the enzymes in the plants cells were at their optimum working temperature. More tests could be done by using water that was at a higher temperature to see what effect this would have on the photosynthesis rate. It is however impossible to raise the plants temperature without affect other factors. For instance the actual amount of oxygen released by the plant is slightly more than the readings would suggest as some of the oxygen would dissolve into the water. At a higher temperature less oxygen would be able to dissolve into the water so the readings for the photosynthesis rate could be artificially increased. It is also possible that the photosynthetic reactions in the plant are occurring at their maximum possible rate and so cannot be increased any more. The light is probably not a limiting factor as all but one of the curves level off before the maximum light intensity of 400 is reached. The maximum light intensity that the plants can handle is therefore just below 400.Water will not be a limiting factor as the plants are living in water. They therefore have no stomata and absorb all their CO2 by diffusion through the leaves. Graph1. Light intensity against NaHCO3 MY RESULTS Graph2. Light intensity against NaHCO3 SOURCE Limitations and Improvement The accuracy of this experiment is limited by a number of factors. Some of the oxygen give off is used for respiration by the plant. Some of the oxygen dissolved into the water. Some was used by small invertebrates that were found living within the pieces of elodea. The higher light intensities should be quite accurate but the smaller light intensities would be less accurate because the light spreads out. The elodea will also get background light from other experiments. The lights are also a source of heat which will affect the experiments with only a small distance between the light and the syringe. This heating could affect the results. Using the same piece of elodea for each experiment was impractical as the elodeas photosynthesis rate decreased over time. By using a different piece of elodea for each experiment did create the problem of it being impossible for each piece to have the same surface area. This experiment could be improved in a number of ways. It could be repeated more times to help get rid of any anomalies. A better overall result would be obtained by repeating the experiment more times because any errors in one experiment should be compensated for by the other experiments. Each person should have done their experiments in a different room to cut out all background light. All the experiments should be done sequentially. A perspex screen could have been placed between the light and the syringe to reduce any heating effect that the light may have. The experiment could have been carried out with higher NaHCO3 to see if increasing the concentration would increase the rate of photosynthesis, or if a concentration of 0.1M NaHCO3 produces the maximum rate of photosynthetic reaction. Conclusion The intention of this experiment was to investigate different factors that affect the rate of photosynthesis. The hypothesis was, as light intensity increases the rate of reaction will increase at a proportional rate. As the concentration of NaHCO3 increases the rate of the reaction will also increase at a proportional rate. This was correct, supported by the data collected which shows at a light intensity of 400 the average increase in rate of reaction was 746v. At 4 the average increase in rate of reaction was 8676v, a difference of 7930v, which shows the rate of reaction is greatly influenced by light intensity. This was demonstrated by Robert Hill and his associates, with similar results to this experiment, which they found that the photosynthetic rate varies with light intensity, and as the light intensity increases, the reaction rate also increases up to a certain point.

Advantages Of Performance Appraisal Essay

It helps the supervisors to chalk out the promotion programs for efficient employees. In this regards, inefficient workers can be dismissed or demoted in case. It helps in chalking out compensation packages for employees. Merit rating is possible through performance appraisal. PA tries to give worth to a performance. Compensation packages which include bonus, high salary rates, extra benefits, allowances and pre-requisites are dependent on performance appraisal. The criteria should be merit rather than seniority. The systematic procedure of PA helps the supervisors to frame training policies and programs. It helps to analyze strengths and weaknesses of employees so that new jobs can be designed for efficient employees. It also helps in framing future development programs. It helps the supervisors to understand the validity and importance of the selection procedure. The supervisors come to know the validity and thereby the strengths and weaknesses of selection procedure. Future changes in selection methods can be made in this regard. For an organization, effective communication between employees and employers is very important. It serves as a motivation tool. Through evaluating performance of employees, a person’s efficiency can be determined if the targets are achieved. This very well motivates a person for better job and helps him to improve his performance in the future. Disadvantages of Performance Appraisal If not done right, they can create a negative experience. Performance appraisals are very time consuming and can be overwhelming to managers with many employees. They are based on human assessment and are subject to rater errors and biases. Can be a waste of time if not done appropriately. They can create a very stressful environment for everyone involved. What Are the Benefits of Performance Appraisals to the Organization? The performance appraisal is an essential part of the human resources department’s contribution to an organization. An effective appraisal may not only eliminate behavior and work-quality problems, it can motivate an employee to contribute more. Often, a company will ask its employees to perform â€Å"360-degree feedback† that assesses peers and subordinates as well as supervisors and management. Regardless, the opportunity to receive — and give — constructive criticism shouldn’t be ignored. Improving Communication All too often, employees and managers don’t get along and can’t understand why. Problems that stem from a lack of communication can sometimes be resolved with a performance appraisal. If the appraisal is used as an opportunity to describe the criteria on which performance is judged — using meaningful and relevant examples — then the employee will walk away from the meeting with a better understanding of how to best perform his job. For example, â€Å"John, when I say you need to be more customer-focused, what I really want is to see you greet the customers with a smile when they enter the store, and ask how you can help.† Providing a Career Path The performance appraisal is the perfect opportunity to address long-term goals that may not be on the everyday to-do list. Not only does this provide the employee with an opportunity to be of greater use to an organization, the employee feels pleased and valued. Lighting the way toward a successful career path inspires loyalty and stability and can improve the bottom line, especially when the employee’s first concern is the health of the business, and subsequently, her career. Encouraging Good Work and Improvement Celebrating a job well-done is the easy part of the performance appraisal. Noting areas of improvement is not so easy. Nevertheless, no one is perfect, and the performance appraisal is an ideal time to diplomatically highlight areas that need improvement. Even the most valuable employee could benefit from additional training, while those who are on the cusp of dismissal need the heads-up. Be specific by providing examples and clearly explain what needs to occur to turn things around. Showing an employee that you care enough about them by taking the time to work with them may make even the most hardened employee feel better. Improving Decision-Making Ability When a company has detailed information on employee performance, business decisions become easier. Filling open positions with existing staff strengthens the organization and promotes loyalty. Knowing which employees display what strengths improves the speed with which projects can be assigned. Appraisals also provide a framework when making decisions about compensation — and layoffs. If the organization becomes the unfortunate party to a lawsuit, the performance appraisal can refute or support claims. As a result, the effective use of performance appraisals helps an organization operate efficiently and with focus. 180 degree 180 Degree – a method of measuring performance appraisal of an employee. As we have already discussed about â€Å"performance appraisal ‘in the previous blog, it’s quite clear that it’s a method of measuring and giving feedback of any employee performance. 180 Degree is one of the method by which feedback of an employee can be judged and measured. Here two people are involved in the feedback process; one is the employee himself and his immediate boss. The employee share his work experiences including good and bad with the hr people, and the boss gives the feedback of the skills and attitude the employee carry. And then the data collected is matched with the competency norms of the organization and a feedback is prepared about that particular employee. And with this feedback the management takes s further actions for better performance of that employee. This performance appraisal form is used in all big and small scale industries and organization. What is 270 degree appraisal method? Answer: 270 Degree is kind of performance appraisal system.. in 270 degree feedback/ review from self, Boss , and pEErs.

Essay Writing Role - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1499 Downloads: 8 Date added: 2017/09/21 Category Advertising Essay Type Argumentative essay Tags: Development Essay Did you like this example? Vishal Retail Limited – Stock Count Vishal Retail Limited Guidance Sheet for Stock Count at Retail Stores S. N o. Activity Responsibility 1. a. The stock count is to be carried out for 14 divisions, wherein, one division will be covered in one day. b. The stock count is required to be conducted by scanning all stock items in a given division. c. The stock count has to be carried out during the night between 10:00pm – 8:00am to ensure timely and accurate measurement of stock. Physical verification of the stock at stores shall be carried out as per the attached schedule. Refer Annexure 1. Project Team, CA Firms and Store. 2. Key Responsibilities a. Ensure stock count is carried out as per the prescribed schedule b. Ensure that all items of a given division are counted. c. Ensure that each item is counted only once and that there is no duplication d. Identify the damaged / unsaleable stock and prepare an article wise list of such items. e. Report all deviation from the prescribed process. Internal Auditors (CA firms) 3. Stores have to follow the guidelines as described in Annexure 2 Store, Internal Auditors (CA firms) 4. Stock count is to be carried out by scanning all items as per the Store, Internal Auditors (CA 2010 Axis Risk Consulting. All rights reserved Vishal Retail Limited – Stock Count S. N o. Activity Responsibility prescribed process given in Annexure 3. firms) 5. The CA firm / internal auditors are required to prepare a report in the prescribed format as given in Refer Annexure 4 and email the same daily at [emailprotected] in Internal Auditors (CA firms)  © 2010 Axis Risk Consulting. All rights reserved Vishal Retail Limited – Stock Count V ishal Retail Limited – Stock Count at Stores – Project Team Vishal Retail: Mr. Sudhanshu Agarwal Mr. Manshu Tandon Mr. Pius Monteiro Mr. Rahul Ranjan Singh Regional and Area Managers Axis Risk Consulting Services Pvt. Ltd. : Team Axis Contact Details: Ema il: [emailprotected] in internal. [emailprotected] in  © 2010 Axis Risk Consulting. All rights reserved Vishal Retail Limited – Stock Count ANNEXURE  © 2010 Axis Risk Consulting. All rights reserved Vishal Retail Limited – Stock Count Annexure 1 Stock Count Schedule: Day No. Date (Tentative) Day Division to be covered Day 1 4-Aug-10 Wednesday Mens Ethnic Day 2 5-Aug-10 Thursday Lifestyle Day 3 6-Aug-10 Friday Ladies – Western Day 4 9-Aug-10 Monday Kids Infants Day 5 10-Aug-10 Tuesday Kids – Boys Footwear Day 6 11-Aug-10 Wednesday Mens Lower Day 7 16-Aug-10 Monday FMCG – Non Food Branded Day 8 17-Aug-10 Tuesday Kids Girls Day 9 18-Aug-10 Wednesday CDIT Ladies Ethnic Day 10 19-Aug-10 Thursday Home Furnishing Day 11 20-Aug-10 Friday Mens Upper Day 12 21-Aug-10 Saturday Household  © 2010 Axis Risk Consulting. All rights reserved Vishal Retail Limited – Stock Count Annexure 2 Guidelines for Stores: 1. All customer transactions should be stopped and all GRCs pending in the receiving area should be completed; 2. NO requests for Sales / GRC transactions should be entertained during physical verification; . Proper stacking and arrangement of stocks should be ensured before commencing with the stock scanning activity; 4. The bar code label should be kept facing out to make it easier for scanning. 5. The store should identify and segregate the damaged article and it should be scanned separately, the list of damaged articles kept at DC (at store) should be updated for the given divisions before commencement of the stock take activity. 6. The bar code / article details of the stocks not kept in packed condition should be easily identifiable.  © 2010 Axis Risk Consulting. All rights reserved Vishal Retail Limited – Stock Count 7. Stock takers shall proceed in an orderly manner to ensure that no item is missed and no item is checked twice. For this purpose, counting shall be done in a sequence, starting from the location of item. Each Gandola / Rack is to be marked with a damage free sticker (22 inch) When the same is completed to avoid duplication. 8. Stocks not present in the store premises i. e. materials sent out to other stores, main DC, etc. should be taken into consideration. Confirmation from the holders of such stock shall be obtained that these items are in their possession; . Ensure that there are no pending manual bills (if any); 10. Collect all items from return counter including dummy(s); 11. Store should plan that there is adequate manpower to support stock take activity. All activity (i. e. scanning) for a particular division should be completed in one night.  © 2010 Axis Risk Consulting. All rights reserved Vishal Retail Limited – Stock Count 12. During the stock count, all items which are unscannable or do not have bar codes need to be segregated out and should be manual entered in the scanning software after completing the scanning for all other items. Rep resntative of CA firm needs to be notified whenever an item needs to be manually entered in the scanning software.  © 2010 Axis Risk Consulting. All rights reserved Vishal Retail Limited – Stock Count Annexure 3 Stock count process to be followed by Store Scanning Process  © 2010 Axis Risk Consulting. All rights reserved Vishal Retail Limited – Stock Count Annexure 4 Report format: Please note: †¢The firm needs to prepare a report for each division (i. e. each Day). †¢This checklist should be prepared by the firm’s representative responsible for a location or department and should be completed and sent before leaving the store. Name of Company Vishal Retail Limited (VRL) Store Code Store Location Division Scanned Date of Stock Count Start Time, End Time and Total Duration of Stock Count CA Firm Name Stock count done by CA Firm Representative(s) Store Manager / other client representative present  © 2010 Axis Risk Consulting. All rights reserv ed Vishal Retail Limited – Stock Count (A) Provide your input based on your observation of stock count and discussion with the Stores Manager: General Description of Inventory (indicate those that apply): Available (Yes / No)* Retail Merchandise Damaged Goods Pending for GRC Special Order / Other Categories * Please mention ‘NA’ if not applicable (B) Obtain the details of the following from the Stores Manager: Special categories of Inventory: Please mention Quantity Value (Rs) * Goods billed / transferred but not dispatched Stock owned by others Goods in transit to other locations / return to DC Goods in transit from vendors * Please mention ‘NA’ if not applicable  © 2010 Axis Risk Consulting. All rights reserved Vishal Retail Limited – Stock Count (C) Physical Inventory Procedures: Details Yes / No Remarks 1. Did the Companys personnel follow the inventory instructions 2. Were inventory items arranged in an orderly manner prior to th e inventory to facilitate the counting? 3. Were different types, special categories and special classes of inventory properly segregated to facilitate proper inclusion/exclusion from the physical count? 4. Was the store team familiar with the inventory? 5. Were sales / dispatch and receiving operations suspended during inventory taking? (If not, describe procedures employed by the Company to assure an accurate cut-off. ) 6. Were the items in the dispatch and receiving area(s) properly segregated between items to be included in stock and those not o be included in stock? 7. Were discontinued/ damaged items clearly segregated by the store team? 8. Was a list of updated damaged / Unsalable was available at DC? 9. Did all LOB heads and store manager signoff that all items in the store has been scanned and counted? 10. Were their any items without bar codes or had a bar code but could not be scanned. If yes, please mention the quantity of such items for each division.  © 2010 Axis Risk Consulting. All rights reserved Vishal Retail Limited – Stock Count  © 2010 Axis Risk Consulting. All rights reserved Vishal Retail Limited – Stock Count Stock Count details to prepared by the CA Firms POS No. Division covered Start Time End Time Total Time Taken Quantity Scanned No. of Persons involved 1 2 3 4 5 6 Total Cut-off Procedure:** Last MRN / GRN No. Vendor Name Date and Time Has material been included in the Inventory? (Yes / No) Amount of Invoice (Rs) Last Sales Invoice No. Date Times Amount of Invoice (Rs) ** Guidelines: 1. Describe reference source.  © 2010 Axis Risk Consulting. All rights reserved Vishal Retail Limited – Stock Count 2. When pre-numbered receiving document or sales invoices are used, note the last number and any unused prior numbers. When pre-numbered documents are not used, obtain information about several sales and receipts immediately prior to the inventory date. 3. Trucks on premises containing either in-bound stock or out-bound stock should be listed, showing number of truck / vehicle, whether full or empty and whether or not contents are included in inventory. Inventory file / result: Please collect the . exe file i. e. the stock count result file on completion and send it with the report. Please mail the final report to: Rahul Ranjan: internal. [emailprotected] in Axis: [emailprotected] in 2010 Axis Risk Consulting. All rights reserved Vishal Retail Limited – Stock Count Declaration: The stock was carried out in my presence on ____________ (Date) for ____________ (Division). All stock available at the store of the above mentioned division has been scanned once and there has been no duplication of stock count. There is no other inventory in my possession for which I am accountable except as noted above. Store Representative – Store Manager / ASM (Name, Signature and Date) In presence of: Internal Auditor Representative (s) (Name(s), Signature(s) and Date)  © 2010 Axis Risk Co nsulting. All rights reserved Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Essay Writing Role" essay for you Create order